Skip to content
emailrules.today
Live · re-probed hourly17 Sep 2026

42%of the blocklists this industry checks publish no test entry.

21 of 50 zones answer nothing at all. A dead zone returns NXDOMAIN, and so does a healthy one saying you are clean, so every checker that asks those 21 is printing a green tick for silence.

50 zones probedRFC 5782 control entrytwo independent resolversno competitor named

A checker can advertise sixty lists and quietly ask a dozen zones that answer nothing, and every one of those silences arrives as a green tick. This is the same question put to every zone at the same moment, using the entry each one is required by RFC 5782 to publish.

  • 2552%

    answering today

  • 24%

    refusing automated queriers

  • 2144%

    publish no test entry

    Nothing to say about anyone. Counted as a pass by every checker that asks them.

A zone that publishes no test entry is not reporting you clean. It is not reporting anything, and NXDOMAIN from an abandoned zone is indistinguishable from NXDOMAIN from a healthy one. That is why our own check asks fewer lists than it could and names every one it could not reach.

The 24 we query

Each one answered an entry it must publish, and one it must not, before we believed anything it said about anybody.

  • SpamCopbl.spamcop.net

    Addresses that sent mail reported by SpamCop users. Entries expire on their own once the reports stop.

    answering
  • PSBLpsbl.surriel.com

    Addresses observed sending to spam traps, submitted passively. Removal is self-service and immediate.

    answering
  • Mailspikebl.mailspike.net

    Addresses Mailspike scores as sending abuse, from its own live traffic sampling.

    answering
  • Spam Eating Monkeybl.spameatingmonkey.net

    Addresses seen sending spam to Spam Eating Monkey's own systems.

    answering
  • blocklist.debl.blocklist.de

    Addresses reported by participating servers for attacks and abuse, mail included. Entries age out.

    answering
  • 0SPAMbl.0spam.org

    Addresses caught by 0SPAM's trap network.

    answering
  • InterServerrbl.interserver.net

    Addresses InterServer observes sending spam into its own hosting network.

    answering
  • SPFBLdnsbl.spfbl.net

    Addresses with poor reputation in SPFBL's distributed reputation system.

    answering
  • GBUdb Truncatetruncate.gbudb.net

    Addresses GBUdb has only ever seen sending spam, with no legitimate traffic recorded.

    answering
  • s5h.netall.s5h.net

    Addresses s5h.net records as sources of spam and abuse.

    answering
  • ZapBLdnsbl.zapbl.net

    Addresses ZapBL's operators have chosen to list for spam or abuse.

    answering
  • SWINOGdnsrbl.swinog.ch

    Addresses caught by the Swiss Network Operators Group trap network.

    answering
  • Kemptdnsbl.kempt.net

    Addresses Kempt.net records as spam sources.

    answering
  • Anonmailsspam.dnsbl.anonmails.de

    Addresses caught by the Anonmails trap network.

    answering
  • Fabelspamsources.fabel.dk

    Addresses Fabel has recorded sending spam.

    answering
  • NoSolicitadobl.nosolicitado.org

    Addresses caught by the NoSolicitado trap network.

    answering
  • Schulterbl.schulte.org

    Addresses Schulte's operators list for spam and abuse.

    answering
  • JIPPGmail-abuse.blacklist.jippg.org

    Addresses reported for mail abuse to the Japan IP Providers Protection Group.

    answering
  • UCEPROTECT Level 1dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net

    Single addresses UCEPROTECT observed sending to its traps. Level 1 is the only one of the three that is about one address.

    answering
  • UCEPROTECT Level 2dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net

    Whole address ranges, listed when UCEPROTECT sees repeated Level 1 entries inside them. Your address can appear here having done nothing.

    answering
  • UCEPROTECT Level 3dnsbl-3.uceprotect.net

    Entire autonomous systems — every address a provider announces. An entry here is a statement about your provider, not about you.

    answering
  • Backscattererips.backscatterer.org

    Addresses that sent misdirected bounces or auto-replies. Its operators state plainly that this is not a spam list and should never be used to reject normal mail.

    answering
  • SEM Backscatterbackscatter.spameatingmonkey.net

    Addresses seen sending backscatter — bounces to forged senders. A different failure from sending spam.

    answering
  • URIBLmulti.uribl.com

    Domains appearing in the body of spam — the brand and link domains, not the sending address.

    answering

The 26 we do not

The list we refuse to query is the only evidence that the list we query means something. Every reason here is a fact about the zone or about its own published terms.

  • HILhil.habeas.com

    No nameserver answers for the zone.

    silent
  • MSRBL Spamspam.rbl.msrbl.net

    No nameserver answers for the zone.

    silent
  • MSRBL Phishingphishing.rbl.msrbl.net

    No nameserver answers for the zone.

    silent
  • SERVICESNETblacklist.sci.kun.nl

    No nameserver answers for the zone.

    silent
  • NETHERUNSUREunsure.nether.net

    No nameserver answers for the zone.

    silent
  • DRMXbl.drmx.org

    The zone resolves but publishes no RFC 5782 test entry.

    silent
  • SORBSdnsbl.sorbs.net

    Shut down in June 2024. The zone has no nameserver.

    silent
  • SORBS Spamspam.dnsbl.sorbs.net

    Shut down in June 2024. The zone has no nameserver.

    silent
  • LASHBACKubl.unsubscore.com

    No nameserver answers for the zone.

    silent
  • RBL JPall.rbl.jp

    No nameserver answers for the zone.

    silent
  • Konstantbl.konstant.no

    No nameserver answers for the zone.

    silent
  • TRIUMFrbl.triumf.ca

    No nameserver answers for the zone.

    silent
  • NETHERRELAYSrelays.nether.net

    No nameserver answers for the zone.

    silent
  • Woodys SMTPblacklist.woody.ch

    The zone resolves but publishes no RFC 5782 test entry.

    silent
  • CALIVENTdnsbl.calivent.com.pe

    The zone resolves but publishes no RFC 5782 test entry.

    silent
  • ICMFORBIDDENforbidden.icm.edu.pl

    The zone resolves but publishes no RFC 5782 test entry.

    silent
  • IMP SPAMspamrbl.imp.ch

    The zone resolves but publishes no RFC 5782 test entry.

    silent
  • IMP WORMwormrbl.imp.ch

    The zone resolves but publishes no RFC 5782 test entry.

    silent
  • RATS Spamspam.spamrats.com

    Neither resolver received an answer for the test entry.

    silent
  • RATS Dynadyna.spamrats.com

    Neither resolver received an answer for the test entry.

    silent
  • RATS NoPtrnoptr.spamrats.com

    Neither resolver received an answer for the test entry.

    silent
  • Sender Scorebl.score.senderscore.com

    Answers 127.255.255.255 — it refuses queries from shared resolvers.

    refuses
  • Spamhaus ZEN (free zone)zen.spamhaus.org

    Refuses shared resolvers, and answers inconsistently through them. Queried instead through the keyed Data Query Service.

    refuses
  • Barracudab.barracudacentral.org

    Requires registering the addresses that will query it, and a serverless function has no fixed address to register.

    answering
  • Hostkarmahostkarma.junkemailfilter.com

    Returns 127.0.0.1 to mean whitelisted. Until that table is decoded, a hit here would be reported as the opposite of what it says.

    silent
  • CYMRU BOGONSbogons.cymru.com

    Lists unroutable space only. A real sending address can never appear, so a hit could only ever be our own bug.

    silent

1 zone we do not query answered today. That is a decision to revisit rather than a result to hide: b.barracudacentral.org. Some are excluded on their own terms of use rather than on whether they reply.

Run it yourself

Nothing here needs our word for it. Ask any zone for the entry the standard requires, from two resolvers you do not control:

dig +short @8.8.8.8 2.0.0.127.bl.spamcop.net    # → 127.0.0.2   answering
dig +short @1.1.1.1 2.0.0.127.bl.spamcop.net    # → 127.0.0.2   agrees

dig +short @8.8.8.8 2.0.0.127.ubl.unsubscore.com   # → nothing
dig +short @1.1.1.1 2.0.0.127.ubl.unsubscore.com   # → nothing

A reply of 127.0.0.2 is the list confirming it is alive. Nothing back, from both, is a zone that cannot tell you anything about anyone. How we choose them.

The record · kept daily

45 days on record, since 4 Aug 2026.

The reading above is taken every morning and kept. That turns “this list is dead” — which is an opinion — into a date, which is not.

Changed since 16 Sep 2026

  • Sender Scorebl.score.senderscore.comdecliningansweringThis is a zone we do not query. It has started answering again, which means our own roster is out of date — in public, where you can hold us to it.

Dark the longest

Zones not answering, and the last date on our record that they did. Several of these are still recommended by tools in daily use.

  • CALIVENTdnsbl.calivent.com.pesilent for 45 days · never, on our record
  • CYMRU BOGONSbogons.cymru.comanswering everything for 45 days · never, on our record
  • DRMXbl.drmx.orgsilent for 45 days · never, on our record
  • HILhil.habeas.comsilent for 45 days · never, on our record
  • Hostkarmahostkarma.junkemailfilter.comanswering everything for 45 days · never, on our record
  • ICMFORBIDDENforbidden.icm.edu.plsilent for 45 days · never, on our record

Zones answering, by day

504 Aug 2026 — 24 of 50 answering5 Aug 2026 — 27 of 50 answering6 Aug 2026 — 26 of 50 answering7 Aug 2026 — 25 of 50 answering8 Aug 2026 — 25 of 50 answering9 Aug 2026 — 25 of 50 answering10 Aug 2026 — 26 of 50 answering11 Aug 2026 — 25 of 50 answering12 Aug 2026 — 25 of 50 answering13 Aug 2026 — 25 of 50 answering14 Aug 2026 — 25 of 50 answering15 Aug 2026 — 25 of 50 answering16 Aug 2026 — 26 of 50 answering17 Aug 2026 — 25 of 50 answering18 Aug 2026 — 25 of 50 answering19 Aug 2026 — 26 of 50 answering20 Aug 2026 — 25 of 50 answering21 Aug 2026 — 25 of 50 answering22 Aug 2026 — 25 of 50 answering23 Aug 2026 — 25 of 50 answering24 Aug 2026 — 25 of 50 answering25 Aug 2026 — 25 of 50 answering26 Aug 2026 — 26 of 50 answering27 Aug 2026 — 25 of 50 answering28 Aug 2026 — 25 of 50 answering29 Aug 2026 — 25 of 50 answering30 Aug 2026 — 25 of 50 answering31 Aug 2026 — 24 of 50 answering1 Sep 2026 — 25 of 50 answering2 Sep 2026 — 24 of 50 answering3 Sep 2026 — 25 of 50 answering4 Sep 2026 — 25 of 50 answering5 Sep 2026 — 25 of 50 answering6 Sep 2026 — 25 of 50 answering7 Sep 2026 — 26 of 50 answering8 Sep 2026 — 25 of 50 answering9 Sep 2026 — 25 of 50 answering10 Sep 2026 — 26 of 50 answering11 Sep 2026 — 25 of 50 answering12 Sep 2026 — 25 of 50 answering13 Sep 2026 — 25 of 50 answering14 Sep 2026 — 25 of 50 answering15 Sep 2026 — 28 of 50 answering16 Sep 2026 — 25 of 50 answering17 Sep 2026 — 26 of 50 answering
4 Aug 202626 of 50 answering · one reading per day, no interpolation17 Sep 2026

How a list earns its place · The authentication index