emailrules.today

Providers · verified 4 Aug 2026

Microsoft 365

The business mail stack — anything behind *.mail.protection.outlook.com. Not the same service as Outlook.com, and not the same delisting path.

sendersupport.olc.protection.outlook.com/pm/their postmaster page

What they published

In their own words.

The numbers

Only the ones they printed themselves.

The negative space

2 things everybody repeats that Microsoft 365 has never said.

An absence is harder to check than a claim, so each one links the page where you can confirm the words are not there — and where Microsoft 365 states outright that it will not publish something, that refusal is quoted.

What you have in front of you

The literal bounce string.

Getting unblocked

The removal path, and whose job it is to file it.

Every delisting guide tells you where the form is. The half nobody prints is whether you can complete it: on a shared sending pool the listed address is your platform’s and the submission is theirs to make, so a marketer sent to the form arrives without the one thing it asks for.

  • Office 365 Anti-Spam IP Delist Portal — self-service, one IP and one address per visit.

    sender.office.com

    Part platform, part you

    The form wants the IP from the bounce. On a shared pool that address is your sending platform's and the submission is theirs to make; on a dedicated IP it is yours.

    How long: Up to 24 hours or longer — Microsoft publishes no firm figure.

    What it asks for

    • The email address that received the bounce
    • The exact IP address named in the bounce

    The trap: Does not work for 5.7.511. Read the code in your bounce before you open the form.

    Microsoft Learn, Remove yourself from the blocked senders list and address 5.7.511 Access denied errors · 10 Jun 2024

  • 5.7.511 only: email delist@microsoft.com with the full bounce.

    Part platform, part you

    Same split as the portal — whoever owns the listed IP has to send it, and on shared infrastructure that is not you.

    How long: Microsoft states it will contact you within 48 hours with next steps.

    What it asks for

    • The full NDR code
    • The IP address from the bounce

    Microsoft Learn, Remove yourself from the blocked senders list and address 5.7.511 Access denied errors · 10 Jun 2024

The dated rules behind this

A quote wrong, a path moved, or something Microsoft 365 has said that is missing here? corrections@emailrules.today. Corrections are published and dated on /corrections, never quietly swallowed.

FAQ

Awkward questions

Who is this actually for?

People who ship email and are too busy to re-read every PDF: week-one marketers, lifecycle/CRM, deliverability, multi-country ops, DTC brands, agencies — on Klaviyo, Mailchimp, Braze, HubSpot, SFMC, or something else. Pick your tool and geos so product-specific pages only appear when they match. EU and UK are first-class filters. Not for people who sell tools about email and need a fake score to demo.

Why only ~40 rules? Isn’t that… thin?

On purpose. A wall of 400 undated “best practices” is how you look busy and still get burned. Every page needs a primary source we actually read. Thin and checkable beats fat and folklore. Europe, bulk inbox rules, measurement honesty, and protocol topics like BIMI/DMARC policy are on the shelf when we can cite them — not every Member State and not every vendor myth. Coverage map lists what we still refuse to invent.

Is this legal advice?

No. If it were, you’d have a billable hour and a longer PDF. This is a dated operator reference written by an email geek. Confirm anything high-stakes with counsel who knows your facts. Same for “will this make me compliant?” — no tool does that. Lawyers and judges do. We say what the sources say and what to do first on Monday.

Why no trust score out of 100?

Because we refuse to invent a number you can’t audit. Fake scores sell seed tests and panic. You get findings, dates, and links. If that feels less exciting than a red dial, good — you’re not the red-dial customer.

Why should I trust you more than my ESP’s blog?

ESPs sell seats. Seed-score vendors sell fear. AI invents citations when nobody watches. We sell nothing today — no pixels, no placement scores, no affiliate — so we can say when a tool is the problem. A human verifies, dates, and corrects in public. Tools may help draft; they do not ship unsourced claims. Check the primary links. Fail that test and leave.

Do I need an account?

No. Filters live in this browser and the URL. Share the link. That’s it. Accounts come later only if they earn it — not so we can nurture you about email.

I’m an agency. Where’s multi-client mode?

We tried a client-name CRM on the setup card. It made the product feel like work before it felt useful. Role filters + copy link + one-page brief (optional PDF title) is enough for now. Complexity comes back when the free shelf is habit, not before.

Is the quiet changelog a bug?

No. Quiet means nothing material moved. We don’t invent urgency so the homepage looks “alive.” Sticky risks still show what usually needs a person when the market is still.