BIMI
Optional branding — shows your logo in some inboxes if DMARC is strong enough.
Say it out loud
“Our logo next to the message in some inboxes. It is a reward for strong authentication, not a fix for anything.”
BIMI (Brand Indicators for Message Identification) can display your logo beside messages in supporting clients. It requires DMARC at quarantine or reject, a logo in a specific restricted SVG profile, and — at Gmail — a paid Verified Mark Certificate. It changes nothing about whether mail is delivered.
SVG Tiny PS only — a restricted profile, not the SVG your designer exports from Figma.
The Verified Mark Certificate. Paid, renewed annually, and Gmail requires it.
p=none publishes a BIMI record that no client will ever act on.
Yours
Nobody does this for you.
What goes wrong
Buying the certificate first. The VMC is the expensive part and the last part; without an enforcing DMARC policy it does nothing at all, and the policy is the part that takes months.
What people get told
The claim. “BIMI improves deliverability.”
Actually. It does not. It is a display feature. What improves deliverability is the enforcing DMARC policy you had to build in order to qualify for it, which is a real benefit that gets misattributed.
The dated rule behind this
A definition is not a citation. These are the pages with the primary source, the date it was published, and what to do about it.
See also
Where this sits
Stop 4, identity gets checked. The receiver works out whether the message really comes from who it says it does.